The Mill on the Floss by George Eliot

The Mill on the Floss by George Eliot (Mary Ann Evans) is a wonderful frustrating read. George Eliot’s major interest is the situation of unmarried women. In her day, their situation was not very good. Maggie Tulliver, the heroine of The Mill on the Floss, must obey first her father’s and then her brother’s wishes. She is devoted to both and never questions her position or her duty to them. This is especially hard for her because she is in love with Phillip Wakem whose father has used legal means to steal away the Tulliver family’s mill. In one of the book’s most dramatic scenes Mr. Tulliver makes his son Tom swear out a written oath in the family bible to get revenge on the Wakem family for stealing the mill.

A modern reader can’t help but want Maggie to forsake her family and run off with Phillip Wakem. Phillip is smart, kind, rich, granted he is physically deformed in a way that is not completely explained, but otherwise he is a perfect match for Maggie. But Maggie’s devotion to her brother Tom is unassailable, even though it is clear to this reader that Tom does not deserve it. Maggie forces Phillip to vow never to see her again only to meet Stephen Guest who falls in love with her in spite of being already more or less engaged to Maggie’s cousin Lucy. Again, the modern reader wishes she would run off with Stephen who is smart, kind, rich and physically fit, but Maggie will not neglect her duty to both Lucy and her brother Tom’s reputation.

Just what exactly does George Eliot want the reader to take away from The Mill on the Floss? Her answer would not be ours, since the book deals with 19th century morals not 21st century ones. Maggie is not the compelling character one finds in Eliot’s Middlemarch. She lacks the depth of Dorothea Brooks which makes it difficult to sympathize with her. She is clearly a good woman, repeatedly forced into situations that risk ruining her reputation by the men around her. But it’s just this lack of force, lack of action on Maggie’s part that makes her such a frustrating character. Perhaps this is part of the critique Eliot offers; the myth of the good woman would have us believe that through her example, through the high moral standard Maggie sets, the men around her would be moved to better behavior. They are not. Tom remains insuffrable and vindictive, Phillip never rises to the occasion, Stephen practically kidnaps Maggie. In the end, Maggie’s high moral compass fails to help anyone.

The first part of the novel deals with Maggie and Tom’s childhood and with the assorted members of the extended family and it’s here that you’ll find the most enjoyment. The long family dinner scenes are colorful, warm and witty. I found myself laughing out loud several times. Mrs. Tulliver and her three sisters, their husbands and children all make up a very entertaining group and provide George Eliot ample opportunity to show off her skill at creating wide ranging characters. Unfortunately, instead of showing us the world in a small town like she did in Middlemarch, The Mill on the Floss narrows its focus to a small set of very frustrating personalities.

 

I don’t think this review is very good.  I first ran it on my old blog Ready When You Are, C.B. back in 2008.  I can’t quite pin down why I don’t like this review much.  It seems wishy-washy to me, somehow.  I rally don’t recall much about the book either, which surprises me some.  Middlemarch is one of my all time favorites, I’ve even gone so far as to call it the best novel in English, but this one didn’t make much of an impression. 

Advertisements

6 Comments

  1. I disagree with you thinking the review is no good. It does give an idea of what the book is about and what the characters are like. I have not read it but did love Middlemarch. I would still be inclined to be interested in this book because I like the time period and the locale. Enjoyed reading about it.

    1. Thank you, Pam. I will say that every George Elliot book I’ve read has had something to offer the reader. Sometimes not as much as Middlemarch does, but there you are.

  2. trish422 says:

    I have no problem with wishy-washy reviews as many of mine follow the same pattern since my thoughts about books are only occasionally entirely positive or negative. And ditto to Middlemarch, such a wonderful story.

    1. I can see what you mean, and agree that a ‘wishy-washy’ stance can sometimes be a valid stance to take. However, on reflection, I felt this review should have taken more of a firm stance one way or another. But, since I’ve been running so many old reviews that I thought were well written, I thought I should run this one, too, just to keep this new blog honest.

  3. Chris Wolak says:

    I realized recently that I haven’t read Middlemarch. It was actually Adam Bede that I’d read back in college. I can see why you feel wishy-washy. After reading a writer’s masterpiece or favorite novel its hard, for me anyway, to lose myself in his or her other novels.

  4. I liked Adam Bede, but everyone should read Middlemarch in my opinion. It’s a marvel.

Comments are closed.